![]() So I explored wet prints, sending off to photo labs for scans, and everything else I could dig up. Finally, I realized it was the scanner at fault. My photos always looked mushy and rarely captured that stunning detail I long coveted. I finally managed to get my hands on a nice setup, but have been repeatedly disappointed with my efforts to capture this magic when I put my film to a scanner. The magical squares are burned into my mind as the height of art in photography. The best part is that it's not terribly difficult, and it's especially easy to repeat.įirst, a little back story: I have always loved the look of a black and white image taken through a Hasselblad V Series camera. And I am happy to report that this experiment has forever changed my photography. A handful of bloggers have shown how their DSLRs are creating increasingly faithful renditions of their film images … something most scanners have not done such a wonderful job with.Īfter reading a particularly convincing post on this topic ( this, too), I decided to try my own hand at taking backlit, macro images of my film. With megapixel counts rising, reports of success have grown. It is logical then to not be shocked that photographers have turned their digital cameras toward film, hoping to gain some magical portal to the analog past. It's not an old idea to use a camera to reproduce images from film. UPDATE: Check here for my new scanning video! ![]() ![]() UPDATE, 1-11-19: I’ve added a color negative scan editing video here: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |